Monday, October 05, 2009

Consumers Union Goes All Political ... Time to Cancel my Subscription?

Below is the content of an email I just sent to Consumers Union:



Consumer Report's position on the health sector has the appearance of political posturing and lacks Consumer Report's neutral perspective. It appears that Consumer's Union is violating its mission in how it has chosen to address the health sector (for example: http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/consumer-reports-specious-stand-on.html

and also

http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2009/10/supposedly-neutral-consumer-reports.html

As a long-time subscriber to Consumer Reports these violations of Consumer Union's mission has me on the verge of cancelling my print and online subscriptions as Consumers Union has afforded me reason to question the veracity of its reporting.

Clayton Christensen and Michael Porter recently released books that critique the US Health Sector. Interestingly, neither book affords support to the models advocated by CU.

What is Consumers Union's response to mission violations? Does Consumers Union intend to continue following its current path on the health sector which undermines CU's credibility in my eyes? Has CU chosen to alter its mission and become a political advocate? Why should I continue to trust CU's evaluations of products generally, and assessment of the health sector specifically?
It will be interesting to see whether they reply.

Monday, August 31, 2009

What Happened to Live Free or Die?

New Hampshire congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter has police eject a constituent because he lacked a 'golden ticket'. What happened to New Hampshire's Live Free or Die attitude?

Monday, August 24, 2009

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Short Life

One has to wonder: Would Obama's health plan would have a life-span akin to the duration of the cash for clunkers program?


I Support the Law ... Except when it's inconvenient

The ailing Senator Ted Kennedy:
“I strongly support that law and the principle that the people should elect their senator,’’ Kennedy wrote. “I also believe it is vital for this Commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election.’’
So, the Senator is law abiding except when the law is inconvenient to his priorities. Given the Senator's obvious familiarity with Massachusetts's Senate succession law, and its implications, he should have planned his resignation from the senate accordingly. 

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Guiding Principles Health for Care Innovation: Some Initial Thoughts

As discussion about the health care sector approaches a full howl, here are some thoughts regarding principles I believe should be guiding discussion about health care innovation:

1. Change the reward structure. A major problem with the health care system is that it rewards treating the sick. I believe the system should be re-imagined as a wellness support system. By increasing the baseline wellness level, resources needed to treat illness due to preventable causes, overall cost of health expenditures would reduce freeing up resources that could be directed elsewhere (perhaps to aid those with catastrophic health issues such as your friend). This tool lets you fiddle with wellness ROI. Essential to wellness program success is careful targeting of behaviors to change.

2. Personal responsibility. I believe that health is a personal responsibility. We each have a responsibility to actively pursue a health. System incentives should be aligned with pursuit of healthful life.

Incentives in the form of modest co-pays, and the like, insulate consumers from the cost of health care. Consumers, rationally, are less price sensitive as a result. Consumers need to have incentive to be concerned about the cost of health services. Increasing price sensitivity of consumers will increase pricing pressure on health care providers.

3. Empower innovation. Innovation is the only path to reducing the cost of health services while simultaneously increasing the quality of health care. Encourage entrepreneurs to do what they do so well: create effective solutions to problems. Innovation is needed in myriad areas, including diagnostic and delivery technologies and in business models.  Christensen, in The Innovator's Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care, provides an outstanding blueprint for how to empower innovation in the health care sector.

A challenge of innovation is that innovation spurs changes in consumer expectations. Expectations re. what the health care system can deliver (e.g., ., what can be treated) are a function of the system's ability to innovate and get rewarded for that innovation. The more the system can deliver, the more we expect of the system; the more treatment we expect to be included in our health care coverage.

4. Focus on outcomes rather than inputs or specific solutions. A focus on outcomes spurs innovation that can yield better outcomes at lower costs. A focus on outcomes is consumer-centric; it puts the focus on quality of patient care rather than on the caregiver.

5. Health care, is a complex adaptive system. System improvement is a function of the system being able to cycle, adapt, and 'emerge'. This implies identifying and removing barriers that inhibit system innovation and adaptation.

6. The market is smarter than any individual entity (human or organization). Ergo, the health care system will operate most efficiently -- yielding the optimal patient outcomes -- when barriers to market function are systematically identified and removed.

These thoughts are necessarily incomplete and preliminary.

Deficit IcOnography

http://gunzip.weebly.com/line-by-line.htmlO's deficit deftly illustrated:

Source.